<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (6) TMI 51 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150373</link>
    <description>Blank registers, exercise books, letter-pads, labels and loose printed forms were not treated as &quot;books&quot; for exemption purposes because the term was construed narrowly as books meant for reading or instruction; the later specific inclusion of exercise books confirmed they were not covered by the earlier entry. By contrast, articles made out of paper fell within &quot;paper&quot; in the later notification because the word &quot;including&quot; expanded the class to cover the listed stationery items. As a result, the exemption claim failed for the first set of goods, while further special sales tax could not be levied on the manufacturer&#039;s sale of the paper articles already taxed at the purchase stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 18:14:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (6) TMI 51 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150373</link>
      <description>Blank registers, exercise books, letter-pads, labels and loose printed forms were not treated as &quot;books&quot; for exemption purposes because the term was construed narrowly as books meant for reading or instruction; the later specific inclusion of exercise books confirmed they were not covered by the earlier entry. By contrast, articles made out of paper fell within &quot;paper&quot; in the later notification because the word &quot;including&quot; expanded the class to cover the listed stationery items. As a result, the exemption claim failed for the first set of goods, while further special sales tax could not be levied on the manufacturer&#039;s sale of the paper articles already taxed at the purchase stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>