<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (2) TMI 119 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150343</link>
    <description>Penalty for delayed payment under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act arose automatically once assessed tax remained unpaid within the prescribed time. The statutory provision fixed the rates and left the assessing authority no discretion, while the rule governed only remittance and demand procedure. The monetary consequence operated as interest-like damages rather than a discretionary penal order; therefore, no prior hearing or proof of mens rea was required. The differential consequence did not violate Article 14 because it followed the taxpayer&#039;s voluntary payment choice and subsequent default. Penalty notices were consequently enforceable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:38:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (2) TMI 119 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150343</link>
      <description>Penalty for delayed payment under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act arose automatically once assessed tax remained unpaid within the prescribed time. The statutory provision fixed the rates and left the assessing authority no discretion, while the rule governed only remittance and demand procedure. The monetary consequence operated as interest-like damages rather than a discretionary penal order; therefore, no prior hearing or proof of mens rea was required. The differential consequence did not violate Article 14 because it followed the taxpayer&#039;s voluntary payment choice and subsequent default. Penalty notices were consequently enforceable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>