<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (4) TMI 88 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150304</link>
    <description>The court did not provide a definitive answer on whether iron bailing hoops should be classified as &#039;iron and steel&#039; under section 14(iv) of the Central Sales Tax Act. Due to insufficient evidence on the manufacturing process of the hoops, the court emphasized the need for factual evidence to make a conclusive determination. The judgment returned the reference unanswered, with no costs imposed and a nominal counsel fee assessed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 10:32:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (4) TMI 88 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150304</link>
      <description>The court did not provide a definitive answer on whether iron bailing hoops should be classified as &#039;iron and steel&#039; under section 14(iv) of the Central Sales Tax Act. Due to insufficient evidence on the manufacturing process of the hoops, the court emphasized the need for factual evidence to make a conclusive determination. The judgment returned the reference unanswered, with no costs imposed and a nominal counsel fee assessed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>