<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (5) TMI 51 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150281</link>
    <description>Transit seizure powers enacted to curb sales tax evasion were held valid only as ancillary measures, not as authority for confiscatory seizure or monetary exaction where tax liability or evasion is not established. The Punjab and Haryana High Court held section 14-B(8) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 ultra vires to the extent it authorised seizure and release on payment of money in the circumstances described, and ruled that the check-post officer lacked jurisdiction on the facts because the record did not show taxable liability in the State or deliberate evasion. The seizure and recovery were therefore quashed and the amount ordered refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 11:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (5) TMI 51 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150281</link>
      <description>Transit seizure powers enacted to curb sales tax evasion were held valid only as ancillary measures, not as authority for confiscatory seizure or monetary exaction where tax liability or evasion is not established. The Punjab and Haryana High Court held section 14-B(8) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 ultra vires to the extent it authorised seizure and release on payment of money in the circumstances described, and ruled that the check-post officer lacked jurisdiction on the facts because the record did not show taxable liability in the State or deliberate evasion. The seizure and recovery were therefore quashed and the amount ordered refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>