<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (10) TMI 107 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150278</link>
    <description>Arrears of sales tax recoverable as arrears of land revenue did not create priority over an existing mortgage, because the recovery provisions authorised attachment and sale only of the defaulter&#039;s property. Under an English mortgage, the mortgagor retains only the equity of redemption, while the mortgagee&#039;s interest is vested in the secured creditor. The revenue authorities could therefore proceed only against the equity of redemption remaining with the company, and could not defeat the mortgagee&#039;s secured rights by attaching the mortgaged property. The general priority rule for tax dues did not apply to a contest between the State and a secured creditor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 11:20:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (10) TMI 107 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150278</link>
      <description>Arrears of sales tax recoverable as arrears of land revenue did not create priority over an existing mortgage, because the recovery provisions authorised attachment and sale only of the defaulter&#039;s property. Under an English mortgage, the mortgagor retains only the equity of redemption, while the mortgagee&#039;s interest is vested in the secured creditor. The revenue authorities could therefore proceed only against the equity of redemption remaining with the company, and could not defeat the mortgagee&#039;s secured rights by attaching the mortgaged property. The general priority rule for tax dues did not apply to a contest between the State and a secured creditor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>