<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (9) TMI 112 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150263</link>
    <description>Rule 31-C of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1959 was treated as a valid compliance measure because it merely withheld permit forms from dealers who had not filed the required returns or paid the tax shown as due, and did not impose any independent or excessive restraint on trade under Article 19(1)(g). At the stage of considering an application for permit forms, the prescribed authority&#039;s inquiry was confined to whether the statutory return and challan requirements had been met. It could not go behind the return, examine its correctness, or refuse forms on the view that further tax, including purchase tax, was payable. The impugned refusal was therefore quashed and the forms were directed to be issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:26:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (9) TMI 112 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150263</link>
      <description>Rule 31-C of the Bihar Sales Tax Rules, 1959 was treated as a valid compliance measure because it merely withheld permit forms from dealers who had not filed the required returns or paid the tax shown as due, and did not impose any independent or excessive restraint on trade under Article 19(1)(g). At the stage of considering an application for permit forms, the prescribed authority&#039;s inquiry was confined to whether the statutory return and challan requirements had been met. It could not go behind the return, examine its correctness, or refuse forms on the view that further tax, including purchase tax, was payable. The impugned refusal was therefore quashed and the forms were directed to be issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>