<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (7) TMI 149 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150261</link>
    <description>Goods intercepted in transit without the prescribed bills and delivery notes were held to involve a statutory contravention, and the prescribed authority was entitled to compound the offence; the demand for compounding fee was therefore sustained. By contrast, the demand and collection of advance tax as a condition for release of goods were invalid because tax can be levied only when authorised by law and referable to an actual taxable sale or purchase. The court held that preventive powers to check evasion could not be extended into a power to impose sales tax on goods merely because they were in transit, so the advance tax demand was struck down.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 18:17:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (7) TMI 149 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150261</link>
      <description>Goods intercepted in transit without the prescribed bills and delivery notes were held to involve a statutory contravention, and the prescribed authority was entitled to compound the offence; the demand for compounding fee was therefore sustained. By contrast, the demand and collection of advance tax as a condition for release of goods were invalid because tax can be levied only when authorised by law and referable to an actual taxable sale or purchase. The court held that preventive powers to check evasion could not be extended into a power to impose sales tax on goods merely because they were in transit, so the advance tax demand was struck down.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>