<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (4) TMI 100 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150221</link>
    <description>An auctioneer appointed by the railway administration to sell coal ash was held not to fall within the statutory definition of &quot;dealer&quot; under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954. The decisive factor was that the railway administration retained control over the essential incidents of sale: it fixed the auction conditions, time and place, determined the lots, controlled acceptance of bids, and received the sale proceeds through the railway cashier. The auctioneer&#039;s role was limited to conducting the auction and performing ancillary tasks under supervision, which did not amount to carrying on the business of buying, selling, supplying or distributing goods on behalf of a principal in the statutory sense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 14:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (4) TMI 100 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150221</link>
      <description>An auctioneer appointed by the railway administration to sell coal ash was held not to fall within the statutory definition of &quot;dealer&quot; under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954. The decisive factor was that the railway administration retained control over the essential incidents of sale: it fixed the auction conditions, time and place, determined the lots, controlled acceptance of bids, and received the sale proceeds through the railway cashier. The auctioneer&#039;s role was limited to conducting the auction and performing ancillary tasks under supervision, which did not amount to carrying on the business of buying, selling, supplying or distributing goods on behalf of a principal in the statutory sense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>