<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (6) TMI 54 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150208</link>
    <description>Printing and supplying cinema tickets under customer specifications was treated as a sale of finished goods rather than a works contract. The breakdown in invoices between paper and printing charges was not ative, because there was no separate bargain for paper and the substance of the arrangement was supply of completed printed tickets. The statutory concept of a works contract for movable property, requiring fitting out, improvement, or repair, did not extend to this printing activity. Property passed only on delivery of the finished tickets, so sales tax applied and the assessee&#039;s contention failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 11:58:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (6) TMI 54 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150208</link>
      <description>Printing and supplying cinema tickets under customer specifications was treated as a sale of finished goods rather than a works contract. The breakdown in invoices between paper and printing charges was not ative, because there was no separate bargain for paper and the substance of the arrangement was supply of completed printed tickets. The statutory concept of a works contract for movable property, requiring fitting out, improvement, or repair, did not extend to this printing activity. Property passed only on delivery of the finished tickets, so sales tax applied and the assessee&#039;s contention failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>