<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (8) TMI 209 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150186</link>
    <description>The exclusion of newspapers from the taxability definition of &quot;goods&quot; under the Central Sales Tax Act was treated as context-specific and not as a blanket denial of their commercial character. Sections 7 and 8 were read purposively to permit concessional inter-State purchases of goods intended for resale or for use in manufacture for sale. On that approach, newsprint was held to qualify as merchandise used in newspaper production, and ancillary materials needed for the business could also be included in the registration certificate. The presence of waste paper as a by-product did not alter the conclusion, because the dealer&#039;s real business remained newspaper manufacture and sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 18:28:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (8) TMI 209 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150186</link>
      <description>The exclusion of newspapers from the taxability definition of &quot;goods&quot; under the Central Sales Tax Act was treated as context-specific and not as a blanket denial of their commercial character. Sections 7 and 8 were read purposively to permit concessional inter-State purchases of goods intended for resale or for use in manufacture for sale. On that approach, newsprint was held to qualify as merchandise used in newspaper production, and ancillary materials needed for the business could also be included in the registration certificate. The presence of waste paper as a by-product did not alter the conclusion, because the dealer&#039;s real business remained newspaper manufacture and sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>