https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150158 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand beyond the normal limitation period. The appellant was held liable to pay duty and interest for the normal period, with the penalty under Section 11AC being set aside due to the lack of suppression of facts to evade duty. The Tribunal found the invocation of the extended period of limitation unsustainable, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant based on the settlement of the issue of additional consideration by the Supreme Court in favor of the Revenue. en-us Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Dec 2018 16:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150158 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand beyond the normal limitation period. The appellant was held liable to pay duty and interest for the normal period, with the penalty under Section 11AC being set aside due to the lack of suppression of facts to evade duty. The Tribunal found the invocation of the extended period of limitation unsustainable, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant based on the settlement of the issue of additional consideration by the Supreme Court in favor of the Revenue. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150158