<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (10) TMI 99 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150155</link>
    <description>After the 1969 amendment to the Central Sales Tax Act, inter-State sales remain taxable even where the corresponding intra-State sale would not attract tax under State law. Only a true general exemption under the State enactment can exclude Central sales tax; exemptions confined to specified conditions do not qualify. The earlier Supreme Court view in Yaddalam was treated as superseded by the retrospective amendment. The Court also reiterated that a party seeking answers on an adverse part of a Board order must independently satisfy the statutory reference requirements; a prior reference by the opposite party does not dispense with that obligation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:41:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (10) TMI 99 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150155</link>
      <description>After the 1969 amendment to the Central Sales Tax Act, inter-State sales remain taxable even where the corresponding intra-State sale would not attract tax under State law. Only a true general exemption under the State enactment can exclude Central sales tax; exemptions confined to specified conditions do not qualify. The earlier Supreme Court view in Yaddalam was treated as superseded by the retrospective amendment. The Court also reiterated that a party seeking answers on an adverse part of a Board order must independently satisfy the statutory reference requirements; a prior reference by the opposite party does not dispense with that obligation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>