<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (8) TMI 202 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150139</link>
    <description>Rectification of a best judgment assessment was unavailable where no cogent material was produced before the assessing, revisional, or revenue authorities to show an error apparent on the record in the inclusion of the disputed turnover. The absence of supporting material was treated as fatal to the claim. The Court further held that once an appellate order modified the original assessment, the original order merged into the appellate order and ceased to subsist for rectification. Any challenge had to be directed against the operative appellate order, so no mandamus could issue to compel consideration of rectification against the superseded order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:51:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (8) TMI 202 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150139</link>
      <description>Rectification of a best judgment assessment was unavailable where no cogent material was produced before the assessing, revisional, or revenue authorities to show an error apparent on the record in the inclusion of the disputed turnover. The absence of supporting material was treated as fatal to the claim. The Court further held that once an appellate order modified the original assessment, the original order merged into the appellate order and ceased to subsist for rectification. Any challenge had to be directed against the operative appellate order, so no mandamus could issue to compel consideration of rectification against the superseded order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>