<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (8) TMI 77 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150127</link>
    <description>A survey can support best judgment assessment only where the recovered material has a real evidentiary nexus with the assessment year in question; material found in a later year cannot, by itself, justify presuming suppression in an earlier year. For 1965-66, the turnover estimate was upheld because the detected suppression covered a continuous period and was supported by cogent material. For 1958-59, discrepancies between returned and disclosed sales provided material to reject the accounts, but for 1959-60 no contemporaneous suppressed transaction or connecting basis was shown, so rejection of the books for that year was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 11:45:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (8) TMI 77 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150127</link>
      <description>A survey can support best judgment assessment only where the recovered material has a real evidentiary nexus with the assessment year in question; material found in a later year cannot, by itself, justify presuming suppression in an earlier year. For 1965-66, the turnover estimate was upheld because the detected suppression covered a continuous period and was supported by cogent material. For 1958-59, discrepancies between returned and disclosed sales provided material to reject the accounts, but for 1959-60 no contemporaneous suppressed transaction or connecting basis was shown, so rejection of the books for that year was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>