<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (11) TMI 148 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150120</link>
    <description>The court held that iron baling hoops did not qualify as &#039;iron and steel&#039; under section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act. Consequently, the assessee was taxed at 10% rather than the lower rate for declared goods. The court ruled in favor of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P., stating that the Tribunal erred in classifying the items as falling within the &#039;iron and steel&#039; category. Costs were awarded to the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 11:18:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (11) TMI 148 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150120</link>
      <description>The court held that iron baling hoops did not qualify as &#039;iron and steel&#039; under section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act. Consequently, the assessee was taxed at 10% rather than the lower rate for declared goods. The court ruled in favor of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P., stating that the Tribunal erred in classifying the items as falling within the &#039;iron and steel&#039; category. Costs were awarded to the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>