<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (2) TMI 103 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150108</link>
    <description>A revisional authority exercising quasi-judicial power may initiate suo motu revision on the basis of an internal note or staff briefing, provided it independently applies its mind to the material before issuing notice; the Court therefore corrected the Tribunal&#039;s view that use of an office note could not amount to suo motu action. However, the authority must remain impartial throughout the revision process, and a pre-committed decision before considering the affected party&#039;s objections offends natural justice. The Court found that the Deputy Commissioner had prejudged the matter, disapproved that conduct, and the revision failed overall, although the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding on the turnover issue was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 18:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (2) TMI 103 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150108</link>
      <description>A revisional authority exercising quasi-judicial power may initiate suo motu revision on the basis of an internal note or staff briefing, provided it independently applies its mind to the material before issuing notice; the Court therefore corrected the Tribunal&#039;s view that use of an office note could not amount to suo motu action. However, the authority must remain impartial throughout the revision process, and a pre-committed decision before considering the affected party&#039;s objections offends natural justice. The Court found that the Deputy Commissioner had prejudged the matter, disapproved that conduct, and the revision failed overall, although the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding on the turnover issue was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>