<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (5) TMI 62 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150103</link>
    <description>Penalty for filing a false or incorrect return under section 10(7) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act could be imposed independently of assessment under section 11(2) where the falsity was apparent from the material before the authority. The Court held that completion of best judgment assessment was not a condition precedent, and the absence of a statutory refund mechanism did not alter that position. It further held that no denial of reasonable opportunity was shown, as notice was issued and the assessee failed to produce records. The plea of bona fide belief also failed because the return omitted the purchases altogether and lacked factual support.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:55:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (5) TMI 62 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150103</link>
      <description>Penalty for filing a false or incorrect return under section 10(7) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act could be imposed independently of assessment under section 11(2) where the falsity was apparent from the material before the authority. The Court held that completion of best judgment assessment was not a condition precedent, and the absence of a statutory refund mechanism did not alter that position. It further held that no denial of reasonable opportunity was shown, as notice was issued and the assessee failed to produce records. The plea of bona fide belief also failed because the return omitted the purchases altogether and lacked factual support.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>