<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (4) TMI 150 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150078</link>
    <description>The term &quot;ornaments&quot; in the 5 April 1961 notification was construed broadly to include jewellery studded with pearls or precious stones, including items made of gold and silver. The later 31 July 1967 notification, which separately dealt with jewellery containing precious or semi-precious stones at a higher rate, did not narrow the earlier notification&#039;s scope. Accordingly, such jewellery fell within &quot;ornaments&quot; and was taxable at 3 per cent, not as an unspecified item at 2 per cent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (4) TMI 150 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150078</link>
      <description>The term &quot;ornaments&quot; in the 5 April 1961 notification was construed broadly to include jewellery studded with pearls or precious stones, including items made of gold and silver. The later 31 July 1967 notification, which separately dealt with jewellery containing precious or semi-precious stones at a higher rate, did not narrow the earlier notification&#039;s scope. Accordingly, such jewellery fell within &quot;ornaments&quot; and was taxable at 3 per cent, not as an unspecified item at 2 per cent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>