<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (11) TMI 92 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150066</link>
    <description>A Massey-Ferguson farm tractor sold by the assessee was treated as agricultural machinery under entry 12 of Schedule C to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 because its essential character was determined by its design, mechanism, special features and suitability for farm operations. The record, including the manufacturer&#039;s certificate, brochures, pamphlets and price control order, showed that it was specially designed for agricultural use and had features such as an adjustable axle, hydraulic control and a 3-point hitch. Occasional non-agricultural use did not change that character, and the contrary argument based on general tractor usage was rejected. The question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 13:18:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (11) TMI 92 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150066</link>
      <description>A Massey-Ferguson farm tractor sold by the assessee was treated as agricultural machinery under entry 12 of Schedule C to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 because its essential character was determined by its design, mechanism, special features and suitability for farm operations. The record, including the manufacturer&#039;s certificate, brochures, pamphlets and price control order, showed that it was specially designed for agricultural use and had features such as an adjustable axle, hydraulic control and a 3-point hitch. Occasional non-agricultural use did not change that character, and the contrary argument based on general tractor usage was rejected. The question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>