<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (4) TMI 147 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150051</link>
    <description>Service of an appellate order on the assessee&#039;s authorised counsel, acting under a power of attorney, amounted to valid service on the assessee for limitation purposes. Because the limitation period under section 10(3-B) ran from the date of service, such service started time to file revision. Rule 77, which specifically prescribed permissible modes of service on a dealer&#039;s agent, governed the computation of limitation, and rule 70, dealing generally with communication of orders, did not displace it or contain any non obstante exclusion. The revision was therefore time-barred and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 12:06:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (4) TMI 147 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150051</link>
      <description>Service of an appellate order on the assessee&#039;s authorised counsel, acting under a power of attorney, amounted to valid service on the assessee for limitation purposes. Because the limitation period under section 10(3-B) ran from the date of service, such service started time to file revision. Rule 77, which specifically prescribed permissible modes of service on a dealer&#039;s agent, governed the computation of limitation, and rule 70, dealing generally with communication of orders, did not displace it or contain any non obstante exclusion. The revision was therefore time-barred and the issue was decided against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>