<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (5) TMI 64 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150045</link>
    <description>Section 3-C of the U.P. Sales Tax Act preserves the tax liability of a firm after dissolution by legal fiction, treating the dissolved firm&#039;s tax as still assessable and deeming partners at the time of dissolution to be jointly and severally liable as dealers. On that basis, recovery machinery continues against the firm and its partners, and a separate fresh notice of demand to each partner is not required where notice had already been served on the firm. The court held that arrears could be recovered from a partner as arrears of land revenue, and authorities arising under different statutory settings were inapplicable because the statute itself provided the deeming and recovery scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (5) TMI 64 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150045</link>
      <description>Section 3-C of the U.P. Sales Tax Act preserves the tax liability of a firm after dissolution by legal fiction, treating the dissolved firm&#039;s tax as still assessable and deeming partners at the time of dissolution to be jointly and severally liable as dealers. On that basis, recovery machinery continues against the firm and its partners, and a separate fresh notice of demand to each partner is not required where notice had already been served on the firm. The court held that arrears could be recovered from a partner as arrears of land revenue, and authorities arising under different statutory settings were inapplicable because the statute itself provided the deeming and recovery scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>