<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (1) TMI 76 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150044</link>
    <description>Interest under section 8(1-A) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act could be recovered only after a valid notice of demand under section 8(1) and Rule 45 made the tax payable and fixed the time and manner of payment. Where an appellate order reduced the assessment, the original notice of demand ceased to operate and a fresh notice was a condition precedent to default; in its absence, the assessee was not liable for interest because no valid default arose after the appellate reduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:30:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (1) TMI 76 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150044</link>
      <description>Interest under section 8(1-A) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act could be recovered only after a valid notice of demand under section 8(1) and Rule 45 made the tax payable and fixed the time and manner of payment. Where an appellate order reduced the assessment, the original notice of demand ceased to operate and a fresh notice was a condition precedent to default; in its absence, the assessee was not liable for interest because no valid default arose after the appellate reduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>