<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (5) TMI 63 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150042</link>
    <description>Delegated assessment power under the M.P. General Sales Tax Rules was confined to dealers within the specified turnover-based jurisdiction, and the statutory meaning of turnover required sale prices received or receivable by a dealer. A dealer who merely used goods in construction and had no turnover in that sense could not be treated as falling within the delegated limit. On that construction, an Assistant Sales Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to assess purchase tax against such a dealer, and the assessment and demand were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:23:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (5) TMI 63 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150042</link>
      <description>Delegated assessment power under the M.P. General Sales Tax Rules was confined to dealers within the specified turnover-based jurisdiction, and the statutory meaning of turnover required sale prices received or receivable by a dealer. A dealer who merely used goods in construction and had no turnover in that sense could not be treated as falling within the delegated limit. On that construction, an Assistant Sales Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to assess purchase tax against such a dealer, and the assessment and demand were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>