<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (8) TMI 73 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150041</link>
    <description>An endorsement of &quot;refused&quot; on a registered postal article creates only a rebuttable presumption of service unless the governing statute expressly makes it conclusive. Under the U.P. Sales Tax Act and rules, no such conclusive presumption was shown, so the addressee could displace service with contrary material. On the facts, the assessee&#039;s affidavit denying tender and refusal was accepted, while the department produced no evidence to the contrary. The final fact-finding authority&#039;s acceptance of that affidavit was upheld, and the factual rebuttal of service did not raise a question of law absent perversity or lack of material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:20:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (8) TMI 73 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150041</link>
      <description>An endorsement of &quot;refused&quot; on a registered postal article creates only a rebuttable presumption of service unless the governing statute expressly makes it conclusive. Under the U.P. Sales Tax Act and rules, no such conclusive presumption was shown, so the addressee could displace service with contrary material. On the facts, the assessee&#039;s affidavit denying tender and refusal was accepted, while the department produced no evidence to the contrary. The final fact-finding authority&#039;s acceptance of that affidavit was upheld, and the factual rebuttal of service did not raise a question of law absent perversity or lack of material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>