<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (11) TMI 90 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150040</link>
    <description>Goods purchased under declarations for use in manufacture for sale are not put to a prohibited use merely because part of the finished products is distributed as free samples. The Gujarat HC noted that the relevant declarations require use in manufacturing taxable goods or goods for sale, not that every finished article must actually be sold. In the pharmaceutical trade, sampling was treated as an integral part of the sales process, with sample cost absorbed in the price of the salable goods. On that basis, free distribution did not breach the undertakings in Form No. 15 or Form C, and penalties were not attracted under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 or the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:17:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (11) TMI 90 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150040</link>
      <description>Goods purchased under declarations for use in manufacture for sale are not put to a prohibited use merely because part of the finished products is distributed as free samples. The Gujarat HC noted that the relevant declarations require use in manufacturing taxable goods or goods for sale, not that every finished article must actually be sold. In the pharmaceutical trade, sampling was treated as an integral part of the sales process, with sample cost absorbed in the price of the salable goods. On that basis, free distribution did not breach the undertakings in Form No. 15 or Form C, and penalties were not attracted under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 or the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>