<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (7) TMI 71 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150038</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act may be initiated on material sufficient to create a bona fide belief that turnover has escaped assessment; a positive finding of escapement is not required at the initiation stage, and the disparity in electricity consumption with the expert report was enough to sustain initiation. Rejection of account books, however, cannot rest on suspicion or conjecture alone; absent positive material showing specific evasion or unreliability, and where the books had earlier been accepted in regular assessment, rejection was not justified. The reassessment proceedings were upheld, but rejection of the books failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 11:11:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (7) TMI 71 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150038</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act may be initiated on material sufficient to create a bona fide belief that turnover has escaped assessment; a positive finding of escapement is not required at the initiation stage, and the disparity in electricity consumption with the expert report was enough to sustain initiation. Rejection of account books, however, cannot rest on suspicion or conjecture alone; absent positive material showing specific evasion or unreliability, and where the books had earlier been accepted in regular assessment, rejection was not justified. The reassessment proceedings were upheld, but rejection of the books failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>