<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (3) TMI 136 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150014</link>
    <description>A State rule under the Central Sales Tax Act may require an additional signature in Form C as an added declaration detail, provided it is not inconsistent with the Act or the Central rules; on that basis, the amended Orissa rule was treated as valid. The rule, however, could not govern purchasing dealers outside Orissa, who remained bound by the rules applicable in their own States. Forms C issued by such out-of-State dealers and otherwise compliant with the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules could not be rejected for non-compliance with the Orissa requirement, and the assessment authorities were required to accept them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:23:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (3) TMI 136 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150014</link>
      <description>A State rule under the Central Sales Tax Act may require an additional signature in Form C as an added declaration detail, provided it is not inconsistent with the Act or the Central rules; on that basis, the amended Orissa rule was treated as valid. The rule, however, could not govern purchasing dealers outside Orissa, who remained bound by the rules applicable in their own States. Forms C issued by such out-of-State dealers and otherwise compliant with the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules could not be rejected for non-compliance with the Orissa requirement, and the assessment authorities were required to accept them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>