<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (9) TMI 105 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150006</link>
    <description>Turnover representing cotton purchased in the name of the mills was not liable to sales tax in the assessee&#039;s hands because the purchases were made as an agent for the mills, not as his own sales. The tribunal could infer agency from the surrounding circumstances, including the manner of purchase, the accounting entries, and the absence of material showing that the cotton was not supplied to the mills or that the price came from any source other than the mills.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (9) TMI 105 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150006</link>
      <description>Turnover representing cotton purchased in the name of the mills was not liable to sales tax in the assessee&#039;s hands because the purchases were made as an agent for the mills, not as his own sales. The tribunal could infer agency from the surrounding circumstances, including the manner of purchase, the accounting entries, and the absence of material showing that the cotton was not supplied to the mills or that the price came from any source other than the mills.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>