<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (4) TMI 144 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150005</link>
    <description>An assessee&#039;s status and liability, once fixed in assessment proceedings, cannot be reopened or challenged collaterally during recovery proceedings. Where the assessment order identified the petitioner as the assessee and no appeal was filed against that determination, recovery authorities were entitled to proceed on that basis. A plea that a trade union was the real dealer could not be raised to defeat recovery, because the proper to dispute the assessee finding was the assessment process itself, not execution or recovery proceedings. The recovery action was therefore maintainable against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:19:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (4) TMI 144 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150005</link>
      <description>An assessee&#039;s status and liability, once fixed in assessment proceedings, cannot be reopened or challenged collaterally during recovery proceedings. Where the assessment order identified the petitioner as the assessee and no appeal was filed against that determination, recovery authorities were entitled to proceed on that basis. A plea that a trade union was the real dealer could not be raised to defeat recovery, because the proper to dispute the assessee finding was the assessment process itself, not execution or recovery proceedings. The recovery action was therefore maintainable against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=150005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>