<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (3) TMI 105 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149986</link>
    <description>Shop rent paid by an excise contractor was held not to be excise revenue and therefore could not be treated as excise duty for deduction under rule 6(4)(j) of the Mysore Sales Tax Rules, 1957. On that basis, the claimed amount did not qualify for exclusion while computing taxable turnover, and the writ petition failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:13:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (3) TMI 105 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149986</link>
      <description>Shop rent paid by an excise contractor was held not to be excise revenue and therefore could not be treated as excise duty for deduction under rule 6(4)(j) of the Mysore Sales Tax Rules, 1957. On that basis, the claimed amount did not qualify for exclusion while computing taxable turnover, and the writ petition failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>