<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (3) TMI 103 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149976</link>
    <description>A quarrying and delivery arrangement was treated as a contract of service, not a sale, because the contractor was engaged to quarry, transport and deliver limestone under the company&#039;s control over place, time, quantity and acceptance, with lump-sum consideration for work done. On that basis, receipts from limestone quarried under the contract were excluded from taxable turnover. Supplies sourced outside the leased mine stood on a different footing and could be treated as ordinary sales only if separately established. The court did not undertake factual segregation in writ jurisdiction and remitted that aspect for fresh examination by the assessing authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 13:59:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (3) TMI 103 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149976</link>
      <description>A quarrying and delivery arrangement was treated as a contract of service, not a sale, because the contractor was engaged to quarry, transport and deliver limestone under the company&#039;s control over place, time, quantity and acceptance, with lump-sum consideration for work done. On that basis, receipts from limestone quarried under the contract were excluded from taxable turnover. Supplies sourced outside the leased mine stood on a different footing and could be treated as ordinary sales only if separately established. The court did not undertake factual segregation in writ jurisdiction and remitted that aspect for fresh examination by the assessing authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>