<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (1) TMI 104 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149964</link>
    <description>A delegated power to extend a State sales tax law to a Union territory under the Union Territories (Laws) Act permits only adaptations necessary to fit local conditions; it cannot alter the legislative policy or replace a mandatory notice safeguard. The modification of section 6(2) made while extending the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act to Delhi was therefore ultra vires, and a later general amendment did not validate that defect. Because the original three months&#039; notice requirement survived, the 1966 withdrawal of exemption from sales tax on durries and ghee without compliance was ineffective, while the earlier grant of exemption to durries remained valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:03:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=167005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (1) TMI 104 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149964</link>
      <description>A delegated power to extend a State sales tax law to a Union territory under the Union Territories (Laws) Act permits only adaptations necessary to fit local conditions; it cannot alter the legislative policy or replace a mandatory notice safeguard. The modification of section 6(2) made while extending the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act to Delhi was therefore ultra vires, and a later general amendment did not validate that defect. Because the original three months&#039; notice requirement survived, the 1966 withdrawal of exemption from sales tax on durries and ghee without compliance was ineffective, while the earlier grant of exemption to durries remained valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>