<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (1) TMI 67 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149953</link>
    <description>Where an assessment under the repealed C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 was revised for wrong application of tax rate, the Commissioner&#039;s suo motu power was held to arise under section 22-B and not under the escaped-turnover provisions in section 11-A or the corresponding provisions of the 1958 Act, because those provisions were confined to action by the assessing authority. The revisional power under section 22-B was subject to a two-year limitation from the date of the order sought to be revised, and proceedings initiated beyond that period were barred. The successor Act&#039;s longer limitation could not be applied to an assessment governed by the repealed Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:49:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (1) TMI 67 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149953</link>
      <description>Where an assessment under the repealed C.P. and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947 was revised for wrong application of tax rate, the Commissioner&#039;s suo motu power was held to arise under section 22-B and not under the escaped-turnover provisions in section 11-A or the corresponding provisions of the 1958 Act, because those provisions were confined to action by the assessing authority. The revisional power under section 22-B was subject to a two-year limitation from the date of the order sought to be revised, and proceedings initiated beyond that period were barred. The successor Act&#039;s longer limitation could not be applied to an assessment governed by the repealed Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>