<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (3) TMI 100 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149951</link>
    <description>Return of cotton borrowed under an actual user&#039;s licence was treated as a loan transaction, because the Textile Commissioner&#039;s permission required the cotton to be returned in kind and directed that neither transaction be treated as a sale. Payment made to clear the bank security was characterised as payment for release of the security, not consideration for sale. The transaction therefore did not amount to a sale and was not taxable as such.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:43:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (3) TMI 100 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149951</link>
      <description>Return of cotton borrowed under an actual user&#039;s licence was treated as a loan transaction, because the Textile Commissioner&#039;s permission required the cotton to be returned in kind and directed that neither transaction be treated as a sale. Payment made to clear the bank security was characterised as payment for release of the security, not consideration for sale. The transaction therefore did not amount to a sale and was not taxable as such.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>