<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (10) TMI 54 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149946</link>
    <description>Liability for a deceased dealer&#039;s sales tax dues was confined to the estate in the hands of the legal representatives, and recovery could not proceed against only some heirs when the estate was not effectively represented by all legal representatives. The court also held that attachment of movables could not be sustained without a finding that the properties belonged to, or formed part of, the deceased dealer&#039;s estate. Applying the same representative-liability principle reflected in tax recovery provisions, the recovery proceedings and attachment were set aside for want of proper estate-based jurisdiction over the persons and properties proceeded against.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:06:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (10) TMI 54 - MYSORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149946</link>
      <description>Liability for a deceased dealer&#039;s sales tax dues was confined to the estate in the hands of the legal representatives, and recovery could not proceed against only some heirs when the estate was not effectively represented by all legal representatives. The court also held that attachment of movables could not be sustained without a finding that the properties belonged to, or formed part of, the deceased dealer&#039;s estate. Applying the same representative-liability principle reflected in tax recovery provisions, the recovery proceedings and attachment were set aside for want of proper estate-based jurisdiction over the persons and properties proceeded against.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>