<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (2) TMI 84 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149909</link>
    <description>The right to appeal and the power to stay recovery are distinct, and a statutory curtailment of stay does not affect the substantive appellate remedy. Earlier recognition of stay as incidental to appellate jurisdiction does not make it an inherent part of the right of appeal, so limiting stay power does not render the appeal illusory. An amended provision restricting the revisional authority&#039;s power to grant stay may therefore govern a pending stay application, because no vested right exists to insist on the earlier stay regime. The article&#039;s stated ratio is that stay of recovery is not an integral component of the right of appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 12:01:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (2) TMI 84 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149909</link>
      <description>The right to appeal and the power to stay recovery are distinct, and a statutory curtailment of stay does not affect the substantive appellate remedy. Earlier recognition of stay as incidental to appellate jurisdiction does not make it an inherent part of the right of appeal, so limiting stay power does not render the appeal illusory. An amended provision restricting the revisional authority&#039;s power to grant stay may therefore govern a pending stay application, because no vested right exists to insist on the earlier stay regime. The article&#039;s stated ratio is that stay of recovery is not an integral component of the right of appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>