<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (1) TMI 73 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149906</link>
    <description>An empowering notification may allow a higher taxing officer to exercise the powers of an assessing authority under the escaped turnover provision, even where the original assessment was completed by a subordinate officer. The revisional framework and corresponding rule likewise support such action against the subordinate authority&#039;s order. For penalty proceedings, the statute requires a reasonable opportunity to explain the alleged omission and such inquiry as is necessary; that safeguard is satisfied where the dealer is heard and an inquiry is held. A notice to show cause issued before the final determination of escaped turnover does not, by itself, invalidate the penalty process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 11:48:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (1) TMI 73 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149906</link>
      <description>An empowering notification may allow a higher taxing officer to exercise the powers of an assessing authority under the escaped turnover provision, even where the original assessment was completed by a subordinate officer. The revisional framework and corresponding rule likewise support such action against the subordinate authority&#039;s order. For penalty proceedings, the statute requires a reasonable opportunity to explain the alleged omission and such inquiry as is necessary; that safeguard is satisfied where the dealer is heard and an inquiry is held. A notice to show cause issued before the final determination of escaped turnover does not, by itself, invalidate the penalty process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>