<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (6) TMI 50 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149897</link>
    <description>Delay in filing a statutory appeal may be condoned where the appellant acted promptly after the relevant legal position became known, and that explanation constitutes sufficient cause. The Bombay HC treated the Tribunal&#039;s acceptance of the assessee&#039;s delay explanation as a factual finding, not a question of law, and upheld the remand for decision on merits. It noted that the approach was consistent with the Supreme Court&#039;s recognition that a legal mistake discovered only after a later decision may justify condonation. The petition was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 18:41:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (6) TMI 50 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149897</link>
      <description>Delay in filing a statutory appeal may be condoned where the appellant acted promptly after the relevant legal position became known, and that explanation constitutes sufficient cause. The Bombay HC treated the Tribunal&#039;s acceptance of the assessee&#039;s delay explanation as a factual finding, not a question of law, and upheld the remand for decision on merits. It noted that the approach was consistent with the Supreme Court&#039;s recognition that a legal mistake discovered only after a later decision may justify condonation. The petition was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>