<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 832 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149895</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by invalidating the reference to the DVO under section 55A, directing acceptance of the FMV declared by the assessees, allowing necessary expenses related to property transfer, and granting exemption under section 54EC for investments made within the extended time limit specified by a CBDT circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 17:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 832 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149895</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by invalidating the reference to the DVO under section 55A, directing acceptance of the FMV declared by the assessees, allowing necessary expenses related to property transfer, and granting exemption under section 54EC for investments made within the extended time limit specified by a CBDT circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>