<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (10) TMI 52 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149893</link>
    <description>A revisional authority may use its suo motu power to set aside an appellate order confirming an ex parte assessment where the remedies are distinct but connected and effective relief would otherwise be incomplete. The appellate order remains open to revisional scrutiny even if no separate revision was filed against it, and reopening the assessment on merits can justify cancelling the connected appellate order as well. A challenge that the assessment record was not separately called for cannot succeed when that objection was not raised before the authority and the record does not show any jurisdictional defect. The reference was rejected and the revisional order sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 18:05:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (10) TMI 52 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149893</link>
      <description>A revisional authority may use its suo motu power to set aside an appellate order confirming an ex parte assessment where the remedies are distinct but connected and effective relief would otherwise be incomplete. The appellate order remains open to revisional scrutiny even if no separate revision was filed against it, and reopening the assessment on merits can justify cancelling the connected appellate order as well. A challenge that the assessment record was not separately called for cannot succeed when that objection was not raised before the authority and the record does not show any jurisdictional defect. The reference was rejected and the revisional order sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>