<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 831 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149875</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed all four appeals of the Revenue. It upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decisions regarding the claim of deduction under Section 80IB, addition on account of creditors, addition on account of capital introduced by the partner, and deduction under Section 80IB on disallowance made under Section 40a(ia). The tribunal emphasized the independence of the new unit for claiming deduction under Section 80IB and supported its findings with relevant case laws, ultimately providing a comprehensive judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 831 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149875</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed all four appeals of the Revenue. It upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decisions regarding the claim of deduction under Section 80IB, addition on account of creditors, addition on account of capital introduced by the partner, and deduction under Section 80IB on disallowance made under Section 40a(ia). The tribunal emphasized the independence of the new unit for claiming deduction under Section 80IB and supported its findings with relevant case laws, ultimately providing a comprehensive judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>