<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (6) TMI 45 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149857</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the revisions, ruling that the sales of coir-yarn from one state to another qualified as inter-State trade under article 286(1)(b) of the Constitution. The movement of goods was deemed to be occasioned by the contracts of sale, exempting the transactions from tax liability. The judgment clarified the criteria for determining the tax liability of sales and emphasized the importance of the contract of sale in such transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 14:45:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (6) TMI 45 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149857</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the revisions, ruling that the sales of coir-yarn from one state to another qualified as inter-State trade under article 286(1)(b) of the Constitution. The movement of goods was deemed to be occasioned by the contracts of sale, exempting the transactions from tax liability. The judgment clarified the criteria for determining the tax liability of sales and emphasized the importance of the contract of sale in such transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>