<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (1) TMI 72 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149843</link>
    <description>Supply of raw materials by an assessee to its constituent units for making shoes and boots was analysed as a transaction for sales tax purposes under the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The arrangement showed that the assessee controlled the supply, retained the materials&#039; ownership, and received no price at the time of transfer; surplus materials could be returned or dealt with as directed, and the members were paid only manufacturing value after deducting material cost. Mere book entries describing the arrangement as a sale did not alter its true legal character. On these facts, property in the raw materials did not pass to the members, so the supply was not a taxable sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 12:53:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (1) TMI 72 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149843</link>
      <description>Supply of raw materials by an assessee to its constituent units for making shoes and boots was analysed as a transaction for sales tax purposes under the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The arrangement showed that the assessee controlled the supply, retained the materials&#039; ownership, and received no price at the time of transfer; surplus materials could be returned or dealt with as directed, and the members were paid only manufacturing value after deducting material cost. Mere book entries describing the arrangement as a sale did not alter its true legal character. On these facts, property in the raw materials did not pass to the members, so the supply was not a taxable sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>