<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (11) TMI 81 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149840</link>
    <description>Section 12-B(7)(a) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 permits review only within the settled limits of review jurisdiction and for facts not earlier placed before the court. It does not extend to curing a party&#039;s omission, negligence, or laches in failing to produce a relevant decision at the original hearing. On the facts stated, the review petition was not maintainable and the court refused to reopen the earlier order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 12:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (11) TMI 81 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149840</link>
      <description>Section 12-B(7)(a) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 permits review only within the settled limits of review jurisdiction and for facts not earlier placed before the court. It does not extend to curing a party&#039;s omission, negligence, or laches in failing to produce a relevant decision at the original hearing. On the facts stated, the review petition was not maintainable and the court refused to reopen the earlier order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>