<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (3) TMI 119 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149821</link>
    <description>A duplicate Form C declaration supporting concessional central sales tax may be entertained at the appellate stage if the assessee gives a sufficient explanation for not producing it earlier, including loss of the original in transit. Rule 6(d) of the Central Sales Tax (Orissa) Rules, 1957, as amended, contemplates acceptance of a duplicate declaration in such circumstances subject to the prescribed certificate. The appellate authority cannot reject the declaration solely because it was not attached to the return or filed before assessment; it must first examine whether justifiable reasons exist for the late production. On that basis, the Tribunal was not justified in refusing to consider the Form C declaration without that enquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 10:19:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (3) TMI 119 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149821</link>
      <description>A duplicate Form C declaration supporting concessional central sales tax may be entertained at the appellate stage if the assessee gives a sufficient explanation for not producing it earlier, including loss of the original in transit. Rule 6(d) of the Central Sales Tax (Orissa) Rules, 1957, as amended, contemplates acceptance of a duplicate declaration in such circumstances subject to the prescribed certificate. The appellate authority cannot reject the declaration solely because it was not attached to the return or filed before assessment; it must first examine whether justifiable reasons exist for the late production. On that basis, the Tribunal was not justified in refusing to consider the Form C declaration without that enquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>