<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (1) TMI 70 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149810</link>
    <description>Concessional tax under section 8(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act was available only on strict compliance with section 8(4) and the prescribed rules. The inter-State sale qualified for the concession only if the dealer furnished the statutory &#039;C&#039; form to the prescribed authority in the required manner; an original form, or a duplicate only within the limited scope of rule 10-A, was necessary. An indemnity bond could not replace the declaration, because the bond was only a safeguard against misuse and not a statutory substitute. Hardship from non-production of the form did not override the mandatory language of the Act and rules, so the higher-rate assessment was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 18:14:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (1) TMI 70 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149810</link>
      <description>Concessional tax under section 8(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act was available only on strict compliance with section 8(4) and the prescribed rules. The inter-State sale qualified for the concession only if the dealer furnished the statutory &#039;C&#039; form to the prescribed authority in the required manner; an original form, or a duplicate only within the limited scope of rule 10-A, was necessary. An indemnity bond could not replace the declaration, because the bond was only a safeguard against misuse and not a statutory substitute. Hardship from non-production of the form did not override the mandatory language of the Act and rules, so the higher-rate assessment was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>