<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (7) TMI 106 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149798</link>
    <description>Form III-A under rule 12-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Rules operates only as prima facie evidence that an oil-seeds sale was for resale in the same condition, and it does not make the certificate conclusive proof. Section 3-AA of the U.P. Sales Tax Act continues to place the burden on the dealer to rebut the presumption that every sale is to a consumer. Sales tax authorities may examine other relevant material to test the genuineness and correctness of the certificate, but a mere fact that the purchaser is a mill does not by itself displace a duly furnished certificate. On the stated facts, the certificates could not be rejected on that basis alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:05:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (7) TMI 106 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149798</link>
      <description>Form III-A under rule 12-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Rules operates only as prima facie evidence that an oil-seeds sale was for resale in the same condition, and it does not make the certificate conclusive proof. Section 3-AA of the U.P. Sales Tax Act continues to place the burden on the dealer to rebut the presumption that every sale is to a consumer. Sales tax authorities may examine other relevant material to test the genuineness and correctness of the certificate, but a mere fact that the purchaser is a mill does not by itself displace a duly furnished certificate. On the stated facts, the certificates could not be rejected on that basis alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>