<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (3) TMI 114 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149788</link>
    <description>Bricks could not be brought within the U.P. Sales Tax Act&#039;s single-point special taxation scheme because the normal trade structure in Uttar Pradesh did not show successive dealer sales; manufacturers sold directly to consumers, so the statutory basis for selection under section 3-A was absent. The special-rate notifications for bricks were therefore invalid. The later Validation Ordinance did not cure the defect, because a validation clause cannot extend the levy to goods outside the substantive scope of the provision, and the amended language still required a real taxable point chosen from among dealer sales. The special levy on bricks remained inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 15:14:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (3) TMI 114 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149788</link>
      <description>Bricks could not be brought within the U.P. Sales Tax Act&#039;s single-point special taxation scheme because the normal trade structure in Uttar Pradesh did not show successive dealer sales; manufacturers sold directly to consumers, so the statutory basis for selection under section 3-A was absent. The special-rate notifications for bricks were therefore invalid. The later Validation Ordinance did not cure the defect, because a validation clause cannot extend the levy to goods outside the substantive scope of the provision, and the amended language still required a real taxable point chosen from among dealer sales. The special levy on bricks remained inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>