<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (4) TMI 132 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149768</link>
    <description>Sale proceeds from an employees&#039; canteen run under a statutory welfare obligation did not constitute turnover under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The court noted that &quot;business&quot; under section 2(1a) still requires a commercial activity in trade, commerce, manufacture, or an adventure in the nature of trade; absence of profit motive does not eliminate that basic requirement. Because the canteen was maintained under section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948, on a non-profit basis as a welfare measure, it was neither part of the assessee&#039;s manufacturing business nor an activity incidental or ancillary to its commercial trade. The canteen sales were therefore not taxable as turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:48:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (4) TMI 132 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149768</link>
      <description>Sale proceeds from an employees&#039; canteen run under a statutory welfare obligation did not constitute turnover under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The court noted that &quot;business&quot; under section 2(1a) still requires a commercial activity in trade, commerce, manufacture, or an adventure in the nature of trade; absence of profit motive does not eliminate that basic requirement. Because the canteen was maintained under section 46 of the Factories Act, 1948, on a non-profit basis as a welfare measure, it was neither part of the assessee&#039;s manufacturing business nor an activity incidental or ancillary to its commercial trade. The canteen sales were therefore not taxable as turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>