<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (11) TMI 72 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149744</link>
    <description>Cotton purchased at Bhatinda and transferred through the Bombay branch for export was not a taxable intra-State sale under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act. The transfer from the Punjab branch to Bombay was treated as a branch movement, not a sale within Punjab, and the relevant transaction was found to be in the course of export. On that basis, the amount was excluded from taxable turnover, and the assessment was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:34:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=166785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (11) TMI 72 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149744</link>
      <description>Cotton purchased at Bhatinda and transferred through the Bombay branch for export was not a taxable intra-State sale under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act. The transfer from the Punjab branch to Bombay was treated as a branch movement, not a sale within Punjab, and the relevant transaction was found to be in the course of export. On that basis, the amount was excluded from taxable turnover, and the assessment was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=149744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>